Dee-licious!
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:11:16 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Sorry, but the timeline just doesn't work.
That would be dependent on the charges. Rove could be facing the same
charges as Libby. That would make the timeline irrelevant.
Do you have any reason to doubt Woodward when he says that Plame's name
was mentioned very casually as an off-hand comment from someone other than
Rove or Libby?
No, but believing Woodward doesn't mean Rove or Libby have clear sailing.
It also doesn't mean either one, or both, are not the leak. You overlook
there could be multiple leaks, a conspiracy to leak, or just one leak
that has yet to be charged. I'd also point out that Cheney has not been
cleared. The investigation continues.
|