"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
...
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
Why are you so concerned about my age? Are you planning on asking me
out on a date? Oh, and why don't you use the income number I
provided? Why are you working so hard to make it sound outlandish? It
wasn't, not in the ad biz in a major market in those days.
You are correct Harry. You said you earned $90,000/year in 1976. In
todays dollars that is $205,000/year.
What is the going rate for a senior account executive in their early
to mid 30's Harry? Does $200,000/year sound a bit over the edge?
As i stated yesterday. the ad agency changed drastically, beginning in
the mid-1980s, and the full-service agency business became less
profitable. I have no idea in any detail what ad agencies pay these
days, but a friend of mine who is in his 30's and working for the DC
office of a big NY agency makes about $150,000 a year. He supervises
work on a couple of large lobbying/PR accounts.
My job title from those days has evolved, too. Today, if I were still
in the biz and working at a big agency, I'd be called either director
of client services or group account supervisor, or some such nonsense.
Another friend who was creative director of a large DC-NY-LA agency was
making about $500,000 a year until he quit two years ago to open his
own industrial film studio.
This link shows the average salary for a senior account executive with
an ad agency to be about $78,000/year with a top end of about
$94,000/year.
http://tinyurl.com/ctv7m
Just to be sure I checked again yet could not find any Senior Account
Executive positions with ad agency's offering anything close to an
annual salary of $100,000. Yet you claimed to have made $205,000/year
(current USD) some 30 years ago.
My hats off to you Harry. How did you negotiate such a salary?
And once again, you are straining to reach conclusions.
Nope. I provided proof of my claims, something you never do.
But we believe you Harry and my hats off to you. ;-)