"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article et,
Maxprop wrote:
Fine. Let's calculate an example. Let's say that a Beneteau 35s5 is
going
for $64k and you have a down payment of 10%. Show me how you are going
to
save money, or at least not lose any, by financing the boat. We'll
assume
you have sufficient money in relatively liquid assets to purchase the
boat
outright.

I'm waiting.

Changing numbers to something more realistic....

$20K buy + $5K fix-it money from an equity loan of ~5%.

Slip fee: $400/mo (probably a bit high)

Misc/Insurance: $200/mo (way high in my opinion)

Payment on loan about $200/mo.

Tax benefit ... well, that's proprietary, but basically, it's a
percentage of the slip fee, misc, loan paymnet, and the right-off from
the depreciating asset over time.

I hope you don't get audited, Jon. Federal law allows you to write-off
the interest on such a loan. But the slip fee? Total loan payment?
Depreciation? Unless you're using the boat as a business, you're in deep.

Well, duhh... if you read just a little bit further, you would see that I
will be...

Also, I don't have to rent or borrow
a boat to get my sea time and keep my license active, and I can make
money (although not a lot) per month, say $300 - average over 12 mos.)

Doing what? Floating bordello? I suppose that might work.


I would say that would be your experience, but you aren't up for it.

Cost to rent a condo, so I can be near clients: $1200/mo (low estimate)
Cost to buy a condo, 10% down on $450K, since I don't have $450K
sitting around (and that's way low) plus monthly mortgage of $1500
(guestimate) plus boat rental so I can really lose money $300/outing.

Once again, the IRS might like to have a chat with you. You must show a
profit within five years or the write-offs become retroactively taxable.

NO. Totally incorrect. There is no law nor IRS ruling that says I have to
make a profit. If I can show that I've made a good faith effort to make a
profit, that's all that's required. Suggestion: keep your day job.

Perhaps you see where this is going.

Sure, I could just pay cash, but then, since I don't have a bottomless
pit of cash, I might be a bit short if something interesting, like
another house, comes up for sale. For that, I would put down 20%,
finance the rest, and have break-even or (like now) slightly positive
cash flow.

Fergeddit. No one can afford Bay Area real estate any longer. g

I can, have, and will.


Bottom line... the cash flow is much better. Thus, it's a better deal
to finance the boat.

Well, I've left out a lot. I'm sure you can pick it apart if you try.

If you'd simply bought the boat, your cash flow would have been positive.
With your calculations, it couldn't possibly be. Fact: the interest you
pay on a boat loan will always exceed the tax savings possible by writing
off the interest expense.

Huh? That's a negative cash flow of $25K all at once!

But to cut to the chase, we were talking about boats used for recreation,
not for business. If you can legitimately use yours for business, more
power to ya. Most of us either can't or wish to risk an audit every other
year. The IRS just loves it when folks write-off boats as a business
expense. The old rule was generally thus: the very rich can write-off
very expensive boats, at least in part, as business expenses, but the rest
of us cannot write off our small craft unless we are in the charter
business. If you do what you claim above, you'll doubtlessly be audited
sometime down the road. Hope your documentation is in order.

You said NEVER buddy. The answer is not never. In addition, there is nothing
wrong with having a deduction as a second home on a boat. You're required to
have sleeping accomodations, a working head, and cooking facilities. And,
that has nothing to do with a commercial venture.

Sheesh. I'm sure glad you aren't my accountant!