On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:03:37 +0000, NOYB wrote:


LOL, you had better read the legal definition of perjury. Before you go
wetting yourself with excitement, I'd point out, Libby is still facing
30 years and the investigation is just getting deeper. More charges
may, in fact, be coming as a result of Woodward's testimony, but I
seriously doubt that they will be against Pincus.

Why not? Pincus's testimony directly refutes Woodward's testimony.

One, it takes more than one person's testimony against another for it to
be perjury. There is a reason for this. In the above, Pincus could be
lying, but then, Woodward could be lying, but most likely, neither is
lying. Faulty memory is not perjury.

This article doesn't change anything. The investigation continues, and,
no doubt, there will be more "revelations". Perhaps, you do not remember
Watergate, but it was a step-by-step unfolding. I read this article as
meaning, the investigation is getting larger, not smaller. For instance,
I'm sure Fitzgerald knows who all those "unnamed officials" are. We don't.

It has been rumored, that at least two officials are working with
Fitzgerald. He's running a tight ship, as he should, and Woodward's
testimony adds to the jigsaw puzzle. This is just more reason to believe
this investigation is not over.