wrote in message
oups.com...
*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
*JimH* wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
Remind me again where I said this passage is about teaching a man
to
fish.
If you can reply without name calling it would truly be a miracle.
You didn't state that. However, after Bert said, "If Jesus had been
a
liberal he would have passed out fish instead of teaching people to
fish" and I cited the Bible story where Jesus passed out fish to
5,000
people (without asking any of them to learn to fish), you offered
your
passage in rebuttal. That would seem, by extension, to be supporting
Bert's statement that Jesus didn't pass out food to hungry people
and
instead told them to go learn to fish.
Nope. I simply asked jps how he would interpret the passage I quoted.
His
interpretation was spot on and provided support to my initial point.
Still confused, sorry.
Nope. I am not. It seems you are though, so I will say it again one
more
time.
I simply asked jps how he would interpret the passage I quoted. His
interpretation was spot on and provided support to my initial point.
I don't have any idea whether you are a Christian or not, and it
doesn't really matter;
You are correct.
do you agree or disagree that according to the 14th Chapter of Matthew
Jesus passed out free fish to 5000 hungry people?=
I believe that the miracle occured.
Do you agree or disagree with Bert's statement that Jesus would be more
likely to tell a hungry person to go and learn to fish, and perhaps
even offer free fishing lessons, than to alleviate the immediate
hunger?
I did not read where Bert said Jesus would just tell someone to go and
learn
to fish if they were hungry. Could you point that particular quote out
for
me Chuck?
Certainly:
"He wasn't a raging liberal. If he was then he have been giving out
fish
instead of teaching people to fish to feed themselves."
There is quite a bit of difference between what you claimed he said and what
he actually said. Nice try though.