"John H." wrote in message
...
On 11 Nov 2005 11:10:48 -0800, wrote:


John H. wrote:
On 11 Nov 2005 05:07:18 -0800, wrote:


Bill McKee wrote:

It's the RATE of change in global temperature. Funny coincedence
for
you non-science christian right wingers, the rate of change in
global
temperature is in direct correlation with the amount of CFC's in
the
air.....hmmmm......


Proof? If it was so obvious, why are not all scientists, at least
the hard
sciences, on board?

Because some are republicans, and as such, must goose step to the
party
of lemmings. Here's the proof you asked for:

http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVF...ouse_data.html


If you need more, just let me know!

That first site seems to say it all. Did you bother to look at it?

LOL!!

--
LOL indeed. Perhaps you don't know (ignorance) or can't comprhend what
you've read. You see, the amount of any given substance in the air
isn't the problem. The problem is the amount of UV penetration that is
allowed, or not, by any given substance. CFC's are the one of the
biggest contributors of shielding, which is the entire problem.

Yeah, Kevin. That point is well made in your posted site, right? Whoops,
just
kidding.


Have you noticed that kevin is getting more and more incoherent?

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes