"Bill McKee" wrote in message
ink.net...

What if they're right? Or, more important, is is possible for there to be
ANY evidence that would convince you?


One major volcanic eruption spews more ozone depleting chemicals in a week
than mankind does in years. When Krakatoa erupted in 1883, upper
Midwesterners almost starved that year. Between the ash and chemicals, it
induced a volcano winter. Was snow in the Midwest in July and the corn
crop failed. We are seeing more solar activity. This does not count?
maybe it is man and all the political spewing that is contaminating the
air and causing the hot air warming. These same "Scientists" were
predicting a mini-iceage circa 1970. Maybe ice age grant money dried up.
As to Kyoto. Would only hamper the US. France, being 80% nuclear at the
time, was posice to make a killing selling electric power. China, could
still go along, burning excess amounts of dirty coal, and no penalty, as
they are a "Backwards" country. China is the biggest cause of mercury in
tuna and other pelegic fish. All that coal burning release of mercury has
to go somewhere, and that is out over the Pacific.


That wasn't the question. I asked you if it is possible for anyone to come
up with evidence which would convince you that our contribution is worth
controlling.

If you find it difficult to answer that for some reason, then tell me if
this comes close to matching your view:
"There's not a chance in hell that I'd believe anyone on this subject, no
matter how perfect their research might be. Period. End of story, and I'm
not listening any more".