"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"P Fritz" wrote in message
...


And meanwhile, Kevin is running around in his tin foil hat screaming
the
sky is falling.

I assume you have information indicating that the science behind this is
all wrong. Coral are not being affected as described. Your information
sounds interesting. Got links?


Coral is even more affected by starfish. We have had global warming and
cooling for eons. The coral survives. Survived enough to make atolls in
the Pacific. The question is what is causing Global Warming. A group of
non-physical scientists came up with the Kyoto Agreement, and blamed it
all on mankind. Why did we have a mimi-iceage 10,000 years ago. Mankind
not burn enough wood?


What if they're right? Or, more important, is is possible for there to be
ANY evidence that would convince you?


One major volcanic eruption spews more ozone depleting chemicals in a week
than mankind does in years. When Krakatoa erupted in 1883, upper
Midwesterners almost starved that year. Between the ash and chemicals, it
induced a volcano winter. Was snow in the Midwest in July and the corn crop
failed. We are seeing more solar activity. This does not count? maybe it
is man and all the political spewing that is contaminating the air and
causing the hot air warming. These same "Scientists" were predicting a
mini-iceage circa 1970. Maybe ice age grant money dried up. As to Kyoto.
Would only hamper the US. France, being 80% nuclear at the time, was posice
to make a killing selling electric power. China, could still go along,
burning excess amounts of dirty coal, and no penalty, as they are a
"Backwards" country. China is the biggest cause of mercury in tuna and
other pelegic fish. All that coal burning release of mercury has to go
somewhere, and that is out over the Pacific.