lmao......Doug just proved my point.

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:10:53 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

Why is it liebrals that are always making issues about race, wanting
to
count race, grant money and benefits by race etc. etc.?

In interviews on yesterday's news, two of the young extremists said in no
uncertain terms that they were treated differently because of the color
of
their skin. Of course, your news reports cater to infants like you, so
they
give you what's easiest to swallow: Jihad!


From one of Len's posts :

*********************************************
I will repeat it one more time.
I think that
1) the way the US acted in going to war unilaterally,
2) conveniently changed the reasons from WMD to removing Saddam
3) it was discovered that Bush knew before going in, there were no
WMD's,

it is much simpler to convince a french kids or wherever in europe to
become jihadist when the US presents itself as big bully, as a selfish
nation, that puts itself above international law, has no interest in
the world community by pushing aside penalty court, kyoto treaty, and
a lot more.
*****************************************

This is where the 'jihad' concept arose. I've yet to hear a news report
refer
to a 'jihad'. And I sure as hell didn't originate the term to describe
what's
happening in France. Len used the term to show that the riots are because
Bush
invaded Iraq.

You can agree or disagree with the logic, but I know of only one source
for the
logic.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes