View Single Post
  #37   Report Post  
John H.
 
Posts: n/a
Default European Jihad?

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:43:14 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:35:45 +0100, Len wrote:

On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:22:17 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

It is immoral to sit safe in your house while you urge that the sons and
daughters of other families be sent off to foreign lands to fight and
die in a war based on a president's incompetency, stupidity, and deceit.
Perhaps, due to the way the present America was taken by force from
the original inhabitants, war is in the cultural heritage of the us
somewhat seen as a legitimate and effective means to an end, much more
than in europe. Our cultural heritage is older, with much more
experience in the field of losing and of what happens if a country is
defeated but also humiliated (ww1, Germany). All european countries
have had their serious defeats and the history books tell all about
it. In europe I grew up (10 years after ww2) with a notion of "war is
hell. It must be prevented as much as possible".

But I respect that sometimes not acting is even worse than acting.
When the acting is based on lies, all legitemacy is lost up front.
Retreat is another matter, you will have to take into account what
situation will arise after that. After all you're responsible as a
world-leading nation that has started the war unilaterally.

Regards, Len.


Your comment, "When the acting is based on lies..." let's us all know where
you're coming from.

Regards,



Most Americans believe the Bush Administration is lying about Iraq, and
the reasons it gave for going in there.


That's a hell of an indictment of most Americans.
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

Hypocrital Liberal