"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim-- wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:36:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

jps wrote:

In article ,
jherring$$@
$$cox**.net says...
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:52:06 -0800, jps
wrote:

In article ,
jherring$$@
$$cox**.net says...
On 4 Mar 2004 09:06:46 -0800, (basskisser)
wrote:

03-04) 05:10 PST NEW YORK (AP) --

President Bush's re-election campaign on Thursday defended
commercials
using images from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, including
wreckage
of the World Trade Center, as appropriate for an election
about
public
policy and the war on terror.

Good idea, b'asskisser. Cut and paste. Then no one can say a
word
about your spelling and grammar.

Bush did a superb job of providing leadership to the country
during
a
time when panic could have reigned supreme.

Kerry's ads are taking advantage of a conflict in which,
according
to
Kerry, thousands of innocent women and children were raped,
killed
or
mutilated.

Which is worse?

John H

Well then, using another "defining moment" in our history, why
shouldn't
Kerry use images of our American dead and wounded coming back
from
Iraq?

That's a real equivalent in bad taste and emotional blackmail.

jps

Would those images somehow portray a job Kerry has done? Seems
like
he
voted to send them, but then voted not to resource them.

You're talking about images of the World Trade Center?

Uh, the "job that was done" in that case was American-trained
Saudis
flew American planes into a symbol of American capitalism.

I'm hoping Bush didn't arrange that just as I'm certain you hope
that
Kerry didn't arrange for dead and wounded kids to come back from
Iraq.

jps


Herring will leave no stone unturned in his flaccid attempts to
rationalize the behavior of George W. Bush, probably the worst
president
in the history of the United States.

Bush and his cohorts have done more to harm this country than the
9-11
terrorists. He's failed to capture any significant number of
terrorists,
he's lied about his reasons to invade Iraq, he's sold the future of
our
children and grandchildren down the river, he's poisoned the
environment, he's divided Americans along a half-dozen fault lines,
he's
done nothing to alleviate the misery of the long-term unemployed,
he's
allowed our infrastructure to deteriorate, and the list goes on and
on
and on.

But Bush's failures matter not to Herring and other flat-line
Republicans like him. They'll vote for Bush not matter what, utter
foolw
that they are.

And here I've been singing your praises and telling John Smith that
most people aren't name-callers.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Krause, bb, basskisser and jps cannot reply to anyone with opposing
view
without insulting them first. You generally don't see that on the
other
side of the fence.

I will admit that I have sunk to their level a couple of times, but
only
after being insulted several time in the thread.

It is indeed a shame that they cannot carry on a civil discussion
without
having to resort to those childish name calling.



You're just right-wing trash, Dennis, and therefore not worth a civil
discussion. I've posted any number of times I am NOT interested in
"debates" or lengthy "discussions" with the right-wing trash here.

Thanks for proving my point Harry.

Have a nice night.


It's not *your* point, dummy. It is my oft-stated position.

Thanks once more for proving my point Harry.