| 
		
		 
			
	
		 
	 | 
	| 
		
		
		
	 | 
	
	
		
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				 Who was behind the Niger uranium documents?
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
"OlBlueEyes"  wrote in message 
...  
 "Bert Robbins"  wrote in news:7--dnRYvmdxRO_feRVn- 
 : 
 
 
 "John H."  wrote in message 
 ... 
 On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:27:23 GMT, OlBlueEyes  wrote: 
 
"Bert Robbins"  wrote in 
: 
 
 
 "OlBlueEyes"  wrote in message 
 ... 
" *JimH*"  wrote in 
: 
 
 
 "OlBlueEyes"  wrote in message 
 ... 
" *JimH*"  wrote in 
 : 
 
 
 "OlBlueEyes"  wrote in message 
 ... 
" *JimH*"  wrote in 
 : 
 
 
 "OlBlueEyes"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 "Bill  McKee"  wrote in 
   k.net: 
 
 
 "bb"  wrote in message 
 news 
 On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*"  
 wrote: 
 
As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no 
weight. 
 
 BS. 
 
 bb 
 
 
 BS to you.  Harry is famous for rewriting articles and 
 posting 
 them as fact, and of creative editing of content. 
 
 Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article 
 (including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack 
 Michael 
 Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual. 
 
 OK.  But I have yet to see a link to the original article being 
 quoted. 
 
 Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a 
 person 
 who cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as 
 original/unedited without posting a link to it. 
 
 This is especially true when that person has a history of 
 editing articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting 
 them as being original. 
 
 Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one 
 sitting. 
 
 Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address 
 my comments is beyond me. 
 
 Well, if YOU could get your ****ing knuckles off the ground for 
 two 
 seconds your sorry ****sucking ass might have found this: 
 
 http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html 
 
 
 You are beginning to sound like Kevin.  Are you proud of that? 
 
 
 Your entire output today has focused on personalities and has 
 contained no discussion of the contents of the article.  Are you 
 proud of that? 
 
 When the messenger says "I did not have sex with that woman, Monica 
 Lewinski." and the semen stain on the blue dress says otherwise do 
 you 
 believe the messenger? 
 
What does Ms. Lewinsky have to do with Iraq?  Other than that she 
 didn't 
cause 2,000 Americans to die?  Pathetic. 
 
 Whooooosh!! 
 
 Poor Ol Blue Eyes is blinded by rage. 
 
 Subsidizing random and unwarranted death will do that to someone with both 
 a heart and a brain. 
 
 Which one do you lack?
Huh? Either your brain, your fingers or your keyboard is broken.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |