On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 18:18:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
Did Harry say he had you filtered? Wow!


On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:10:44 -0500, "Dr. Dr. Smithers" Ask Me about my
Phd @
Diploma Mill .com wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
DSK wrote:
wrote:
....a lot of the people who got swept up by mistake and
hauled to Abu Ghraib might not have harbored a passionate hatred for
the US before they were forced to stand naked and jack off for the
amusement of female prison guards, etc,......but they certainly hated
the US when they were released.
But you see, increasing the number of America's enemies only makes us
stronger. Anything less is cowardly appeasement.


Will you next suggest that we ultimately kill everybody that we
torture
so word doesn't get out? That we should operate outside the law, and
in
secret? Forgive me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that the *exact*
behavior,
by Saddam Hussein, that we sacrificed thousands of dead and wounded
Americans and $200 billion +++++ to try to stop?

Yeah, but that was him.

DSK

You fellows are getting far too Orwellian for this group. Oh, and for
Smithers' sake, that would be George Orwell, the British author, not
Orson Welles. the actor, or Martin Luther, the anti-Semite.

I only see Smithers second-hand, as it were. He's filtered, but some of
his posts are picked up and requoted and obviously I see some of those.
D'oh.

Seriously Harry, that feeble excuse is getting old.



Excuse? It is the way it is. I don't see any of the sh*thead's posts
directly, but only when one of them is requoted by someone else. Is that
a difficult concept for you?

Except...I didn't quote it.

WHOOOPS!
--
John H

"It's *not* a baby kicking, bride of mine, it's just a fetus!"

HK