The liberals among us don't like the real news from Iraq, besides, you don't
get the real news from CNN or ET anyways. They don't want to admit the
truth about all of the WMD findings that we have found. Over 1.55 Metric
tons of enriched uranium? The Serin Gas? The largest stockpile of
Anthrax in the world? Are these things simply tonka toys to the liberals?
Why is it that you don't find any of these stories on CNN, ABC, NBC, and the
rest of the alphabet???????? Because the truth helps Bush, instead the
concentrate on all of the bad.

If you look up the definition of a "Lie" you will find that a lie is when
you say something you know to be false at the time that you say it.
Everything that Bush has said was thought to be true. If you really think
he lied, than please tell us what the lie is that he said - SPECIFICALLY.

IMHO
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:19:23 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


Saddam and many other heads of state are always interested in
obtaining all sorts of weaponry and components. That doesn't mean
they have them, can get them, can use them if they get them, et
cetera.
Saddam had WMD. If allowed he would have used them, again. Bush didn't
lie about
the WMD.
Right. Saddam's dog ate them.

I guess all these folks lied also.......eh?


You can repeat that list from now until the end of time, and it won't
make a difference. Talking up a problem and invading a country are not
equivalents.


You said Bush lied us into war, and specifically lied about WMD. The
quotes that JimH posted show that the prevailing belief among *both* sides
of the aisle in Congress was that Saddam had WMD. If Bush was simply
restating what *everybody* was already saying, then exactly how did he
lie?

Hmmmmm?