"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
Jack Goff wrote in
:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 21:56:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:

"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no
weight.
BS.

bb

BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting
them as fact, and of creative editing of content.
Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article
(including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael
Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual.
OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being
quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited
without posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing
articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being
original.



Giggle.
"When idiots are confused and addled, they tend to laugh nervously".
http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html

The article came from former left-leaning CIA people with an agenda.
It's trash.




Chink, chink, chink...the sounds of Bush's armor being chinked away.

And that's a good thing? Tearing down the Commander in Chief in time of
war? What kind of message does it send to our enemy?

Here's a fact that I bet most Americans didn't know:
When the opposition leaders started criticizing Lincoln in time of war, and
tried getting men to *not* enlist in the army, Lincoln had them exiled. And
history has forgiven Lincoln for it a century and a half later. In fact,
history considers him one of our best Presidents.

Perhaps Bush ought to follow the example set forth by Lincoln.