"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in :


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
" *JimH*" wrote in
:


"OlBlueEyes" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in
k.net:


"bb" wrote in message
news On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:14:15 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:

As you did not provide a link to the article it carries no
weight.

BS.

bb


BS to you. Harry is famous for rewriting articles and posting
them as fact, and of creative editing of content.

Do a Google search on some of the principals in the article
(including the Iran-Contra arms dealer and Israel flack Michael
Ledeen) and you will find it is entirely factual.

OK. But I have yet to see a link to the original article being
quoted.

Regardless, that does not dismiss the responsibility of a person who
cuts/pastes an entire article and reports it as original/unedited
without posting a link to it.

This is especially true when that person has a history of editing
articles to meet his particular views, yet presenting them as being
original.

Krause isn't able to compose that many coherent sentences in one
sitting.

Why you had to respond with a flame on Harry rather than address my
comments is beyond me.

Well, if YOU could get your ****ing knuckles off the ground for two
seconds your sorry ****sucking ass might have found this:

http://www.amconmag.com/2005/2005_11_07/feature.html


You are beginning to sound like Kevin. Are you proud of that?


Your entire output today has focused on personalities and has contained no
discussion of the contents of the article. Are you proud of that?

When the messenger says "I did not have sex with that woman, Monica
Lewinski." and the semen stain on the blue dress says otherwise do you
believe the messenger?