Lying POS = Gould
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:17:27 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:41:57 -0600, Skipper wrote:
You have clearly crossed the bounds of decency and fair play. No
matter what Gould may or may not have done.....in the past... here and
now, in the present, you are just wrong...
You originally stated that Gould attacked you first. I can find no
evidence of that. Google the proof, if there is any....
You *have,* however, in retribution, committed the same foul that you
accuse him of.
I suspect that there is not one poster here that cares one whit
whether you and Gould had a personal falling-out nearly 10 years ago.
If you have a clear claim, take it to a small claims court.... or if
significantly wronged.. take it to a Superior Court.
We don't make judgments here. We don't award damages. We don't vote.
Therefore, if you want to get something out of this exchange of words
take it to the proper venue. Thus far, you have just exposed your
dirty laundry. You have made no compelling case. You have offered no
evidence, whatsoever. You have made yourself look vicious, petty, and
vulgar. You have harmed only yourself.
Please cease and desist.....
I concur.
--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD
|