"PocoLoco" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:48:47 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"P Fritz" wrote in message
...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:32:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"P Fritz" wrote in message
...

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:53:06 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

DSK wrote:
Dan J.S. wrote:
First, how do you respond the the fact you liberals want a
draft.

1- I am not a liberal
2- "Liberals" don't want a draft, nor do I.


I want a draft.

I want the sons and daughters of rich Republican voters drafted
and
sent
over to Iraq to die with the sons and daughters of the mostly
poor.
Having a military force with 50,000 sons and daughters of
wealthy
Republican families in it would tend to chill a simple-minded
President's desire to engage in imperialism.

All young men and women 18-25 should be entered in a draft pool.
No
exemptions, except for serious disability.

Horse feathers.

Harry is just illustratig his total lack of understanding of the
military.




So, Fruitz, you're saying that preferential treatment is an integral
and
permanent aspect of the military?


Do you think OCS, ROTC, and West Point officers are treated the
same?

As typical, the liebrals just don't get it.

Moron. If you've received training ahead of other new arrivals, you
*should*
be treated differently. Having a parent in congress, or is the
president's
personal attorney is not comparable with the things you mentioned.


The answer to your question is 'yes'. Is it right? No. And, that
includes
preferential treatment based on race or sex.

The whole point is that a draft is completely unecessary, and would
serioulsy harm the effectiveness of the military. As usual, the leibrals
want to politicize the military and make it politcallt correct.......they
just don't get it.



--
John H

"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant:
It's just that they know so much that isn't so."

Ronald Reagan