2- do you think it's a good idea for the U.S. gov't (in theory a
proponent of "freedom") to simply grab anybody they don't like, and lock
them up forever, with no accountability?


Dave wrote:
Wrong argument on several scores, Doug.

That must be why you cannot answer the question I asked.

... But perhaps I can help you focus
your thinking more clearly.


I doubt it, since you cannot answer two simple questions on the subject.

As you know, the courts have held that those held in Gitmo are entitled to a
hearing in some form.

True, and actually a bit surprising. I assume things will be different
now the Chief Justice Roberts is in the saddle, and even more different
once Ms. Meirs joins in.

The next obvious question (not that I expect you to answer, since you've
scrupulously avoided answering my questions so far) is 'How long can the
U.S. hold prisoners without even granting them any hearing?' The answer
is obviously in excess of three years.

DSK