In article ,
Dave wrote:

On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:25:37 +1000, OzOne said:

Don't you think that it would be a good idea if the guys that you
_suspect_ of having shot at your guys had some evidence presented to
show that they had actually done that...any time in the 3 years that
some have been held would be nice....or is it 4 years since
Afghanistan?

No, Oz, I don't think it would be a good idea to hold a trial for every
captured POW over whether he was in fact fighting. How many of those trials
were there in WWI? WWII? The Korean conflict? The Vietnam war? Any other war
you can name

.............. except that your Govt has *specifically* denied that
these people are POW's. Now, where does that leave your argument, Dave?

PDW