John H wrote:

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:23:46 -0800, jps wrote:
Snipped

Last week, a Washington-based interest group released a report detailing
what it called many examples of the administration distorting the
scientific process to achieve desired policy answers relating to
pollution, embryo research and other topics. Some in Congress, led by
Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), have also been getting vocal on the
topic, as have academics, scientific organizations and science journal
editors.

Here's some more info on the 'concerned scientists':

Ah, yes. The unbiased Union of Concerned Scientists. Here is even more
information on this unbiased group with all the intellectual integrity
of Harry Krause:


Union of Concerned Scientists

"Confused Scientists."
— S. Fred Singer, George Mason University professor and president of
the Science & Environmental Policy Project, in The Washington Times,
August 11, 2000


You're quoting the Moonie paper, fella. Therefore, you are standing on a
log rotating in the water. Is that the paper you read at home? The
Moonie paper?