Harry ,,, why do you accuse someone else of making a dumb statement ?? When
you said,,

""Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find
work.""

You know these newly laid off workers, they are the uncompetitive ones, the
ones who have landed in this position because of their own stupidity. The
reason they cannot find work there Harry is because they will only work for
a ridiculous amount of money, with all the fringes. They are so spoiled by
the ridiculous packages they have had historically that they now are ruined
and will not work for anyone for less than 50,000 per year, even if it is
picking cherries.
The union mentality. Cannot find work??? I think not, I think they are
ruined, I wouldn't want to hire an ex union worker, never.






"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@107 7816413.nulluser.com...
NOYB wrote:

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3
million
jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey
data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The
Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new
businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find
work.

Many a millionaire started off as a laid-off worker who became
self-employed
out of necessity. Working for a corporation leaves a lot to be desired.
For many of the workers, getting laid-off may be a blessing in disguise.


Are you testing the next dumb statement to come out of the Bush
Administration?