Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
Ah I see - so the political blogs that are coveted places of discourse
by both political parties for advancing their agendas and viewpoints
are not relevant to you because you are better than them?


Not at all. I have work to do and a real life to attend.

I'm not in the least bit interested in "political discourse" nor
"advancing agendas" but rather, what each person does in the real world.
Outgassing a lot of words on the net doesn't affect anything, except it
can generate a unified field of talking heads all agreed on a point. It
gives them a feeling that they're right, but that doesn't change the
real world one bit.



My morals? You are challenging MY morals?

???

Feeling guilty about something?
Other than that you lie to try and make political points, and you think
furriners are bad just because some of them are French, and you've
raised your children to use violence when threatened by ideas, I don't
know a thing about your morals.


My observation is that the liberal/lefties are much more vulgar

Well, that may be true in blog-world but it's the exact opposite in the
real world.


Really?

Prove it.


Tell me Tom, which of the two of us has cussed out the other, using a
long string of vulgar profanities?


Yes I did - politely in fact

WHAT?
You want me to google up your posts following the evolution expose? You
call that polite?

... and you deserved it.


Heres' another lesson in morals- when you are proven wrong on a subject,
instead of admitting your mistake and learning, you say that the other
person deserves to be called names, and if he persists, to be slapped by
your children.

No wonder President Bush thinks torture is OK, when he's backed by
people with your "morals."


And this particular morning, you deserve this too - you are well and
truly an ass Doug.

Yeah. Whatever.
That was polite, right?

I guess calling names is better than facing facts, if you have a certain
political leaning that makes you always right no matter what.

DSK