NOYB wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...



If you think Harry's photo "looks professional", and you are "very
impressed" with it, you don't know **** about photography.

Why are you bagging on Harry's photo, bassie?

I'm not. They are good for amateur photos. You need to learn (yet
again) to comprehend what you read. Smithers said the photos "look
professional", they do not. Plain enough for you?