View Single Post
  #79   Report Post  
PocoLoco
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2 Oct 2005 16:33:08 -0700, wrote:


PocoLoco wrote:
On 30 Sep 2005 19:47:48 -0700,
wrote:


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 30 Sep 2005 18:12:35 -0700,
wrote:

Stereotypes facilitate binary thinking because, with a stereotype,
entire groups of people can be reduced to a single factor subject to a
preexisting conclusion. When you reduce your question to two single
factors, you have a binary proposition.

Not really.

Mathematically, in particular when building a truth table, any number
of inputs always resolve to two states - 1 and 0 (yes/no, true/false).
This is true for any number system actually no matter how it is
expressed. But I digress.

There are varying decision states in truth tables, but they still
resolve to 1 or 0.

In fact, if you combine varying states of NOT, OR, AND, NOR, NAND and
EOR and resolve their states, you always end up with either 1 or 0.

This is true for any given number of inputs.

So, in effect, almost all decisions, if proper rules of logic are
applied, are binary - yes/no, true/false.

Can't be any other way.


Only when probable results are considered. Many decisions require moral
judgment and evaluation and in some cases will transcend the bounds of
objectivity or logic.


Example?

Judgement and evaluation are part of the decision making process, but they are
not the decision.


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."



Moral evaluation and judgments influence the group of factors selected
for consideration in a decision.


The factors selected for consideration or evaluation may be multiple. However,
the final decision is a result of binary thinking -- either yes or no, this or
that.

--
John H.

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes