On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:05:38 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...
wrote:


Funny comment from a guy who is one of the few proven liars in the
group.
("That old ad did have my address and phone number, I edited them out
early this morning"). Just because you finally confessed and apologized
for that whopper that doesn't give you license to call "liar" when
somebody makes a general statement (saying that you claim to post that
way all the time and the microscopically correct and exact quote turns
out to be a statement that it had "been a trait for a while.") Yeah,
your "edited the ad" story was a small lie, but having told it sort of
knocks the legs out from under your high liar-hunting horse, doesn't
it?


Chuck finally 'takes the gloves off'!
Unfortunately, trying to be understanding and forgiving in this newsgroup
is viewed as a weakness.

Chuck took the gloves off several days ago when he came up with this
ridiculous allegation.

I have posted my proof.

Let's see how long it takes Chuck to apologize to me for his whopper of a
lie.


Jim, I don't think the phrase 'whopper of a lie' is really appropriate, do you?
If he thought you were spoofing Skipper, and so stated, then he wasn't lying. He
was stating a belief, which may have been erroneous.

If Bush thought there were WMD in Iraq, and so stated, then he wasn't lying. He
was stating a belief, which may have been erroneous.

By using the phrase 'whopper of a lie', you are putting Chuck in the same
category as a couple of other folks in the group. He may be mistaken, and he may
owe you an apology, but he sure doesn't belong with those two!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."