"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No offense to these brave Cubans, and I'm glad they're here safely, but
these kinds of landings speak volumes about the failure of the Bush
Administration to protect out borders. Virtually anyone who wants to
can
land a boat on our shorelines, and offload terrorists carrying
dangerous
chemical or biological materials. Or they can run a boat into one of
our
harbors and have a nice tactical or even a small strategic nuke
aboard.

And I'm sure there's a way to protect against that, right? If a large
cargo
ship has a 25' walkaround loaded with a suitcase nuke, and they unload
it in
the middle of the night, there is no way to differentiate that boat from
the
hundreds of others that will be returning to harbor one Saturday after
fishing.

The only way to diminish the threat is to go into the countries where
these
guys live and kill every one of the *******s that don't wave an Amercian
flag whenever a column of our M1A1's are rolling by. We invaded
Afghanistan...and the liberals whined. We invaded Iraq, and the
liberals
whined some more. We pressured Lybia into disarming, and the liberals
dismissed it as irrelavent. We recently placed sanctions on Syria
(likely
just a harbinger of a future military action there), and the liberals
say
Bush isn't doing enough. I realize it's an election year, but you guys
have
lost your marbles.

We're going to run out of troops long before we run out of potential
terrorists. If you're so hot to trot, why don't you sign up for some
near the front dentistry assignments?

You're sorta like Bush on this matter...talk tough but let the others do
the walk.

I'm a lot like Bush except in one way: I wouldn't have taken the time to
painstakingly differentiate between the "innocents" and the "terrorists".
Following 9/11, the entire Middle East would have been rubble if my finger
was on the button.