thunder wrote:

I'm not alone in the opinion that the Supreme Court "short-circuited" the
process.

Nope. Anybody that looks at the facts will conclude that the Supremes acted in a partisan fashion and
probably illegally.

Scott McFadden wrote:

I swear, some folks never-ending crybabying, almost four years after
the fact, is nearly as amusing as their shocking ignorance of US
history which they so proudly display for all to see, here on
rec.boat.

What's shocking is that you miss the point. Repeatedly. And you so proudly display your obtuseness etc
etc.

The point is not that Bush was not elected by a majority vote (since that's not the way the President is
elected anyway). The point is that the Supreme Court interfered with the election on blatantly partisan
grounds.

Of course, to many people, cheating isn't wrong if your chosen side wins.

DSK