"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
.com...
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
says...
"jps" wrote in message
...
If the Saudis help us get rid of Dubya by keeping fuel prices
high
while
preventing economic recovery, I'd be happy to pay $2.50 a
gallon
for
my
twin 454 gas hogs all summer long.
Imagine that! A democrat hoping for lousy economic conditions
so
that
his
party can benefit from them. You guys are a sick, demented
bunch.
Because we don't think MONEY IS EVERYTHING like you jokers?
Wishing poor economic conditions on our country is despicable. You
think
the wealthy are the ones who are hurt most by an economic downturn?
NOYB, you forgot to call him a traitor. You know, anybody that says
anything anti-BushCo is a stinking traitor, remember?
Wishing harm on your on country, whether physically or economically, is
traitorous. So you're right. He *is* a traitor.
So, when Clinton was in office, YOU were a traitor, but now you're not?
I didn't wish harm on my country. I hoped the Republican Congress could
pass the 10 points that they promoted in the Contract with America. They
past most of 'em...and our country did pretty well as a result.
Too bad they were stonewalled by the Clinton Administration on Item #6:
THE NATIONAL SECURITY RESTORATION ACT: No U.S. troops under U.N. command
and restoration of the essential parts of our national security funding to
strengthen our national defense and maintain our credibility around the
world.
9/11 might not have happened had they achieved *all* of their goals...and
Clinton hadn't forced the cutting of intelligence funding.
Please show where in U.S. law, a person can be held as a traitor,
because he wishes economic harm to the United States. Show where, in
U.S. law, a person can be held as a traitor because of WISHING
physical harm to his country.