Doug,
I don't know which one do you think?


"DSK" wrote in message
.. .
PocoLoco wrote:
Opinions, yes.


Let's see, which opinion is more valid- one based on real economics, as
explained in most freshman economics tests, and correctly using terms as
defined within that specialty, or a bunch yak-yak from people who are
trying to make excuses for the failed policies of a politician whom they
worship (who nontheless has systematically violated every principle they
try to claim)?

Which one is more valid, the one with documentation from many sources, or
the one that repeatedly says "you're wrong so shut up" and can offer no
back up? Other than a bunch of me-too from sock puppets, all equally
lacking in knowledge of facts?

Which opinion carries more weight with you, those stated by somebody who
bad-mouths libby-rulls and vigorously hates the Clintons (and homos and
Muslims etc etc) or one that presents some historical fact and real life
data?

Opinions, yes.

DSK