"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 03:03:10 +0000, NOYB wrote:


He may very well *be* a traitor, but not for his anti-Vietnam War
stance.
If the following is true, the scumbag is back-dooring the President on
foreign
policy...and is possibly inciting Iran to organize increased resistance
in
Iraq. If true, his actions are treasonous because they're putting
our troops in further danger. Hell, Kerry is practically *begging* Iran
to
help make our effort in Iraq fail...so that he can "build new
friendships
and overcome
tensions with others".

The mud is really starting to fly. This all sounds vaguely reminiscent of
a previous time.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html

I hope you're taking the moral high road and are condemning *both* sides for
acts that could be considered treasonous. If Reagan's people did as your
links suggest, that's treason. If Kerry's office sent a letter to Iran and
is effectively undermining the efforts of our soldiers, then he's a scumbag
and should be shot.

Charlie Rangel likes to say "nobody got killed killed when Clinton lied".
Well, nobody got killed if Reagan delayed the hostage's return. Men *are*
getting killed if Kerry is stoking the fires in Iran, and causing the
Iranian intelligence agency to incite continued attacks on our troops.