"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:29:04 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Why is Rumsfeld protecting the details from a program that was destroyed
before Bush even took office? The Bush's and Clinton's sure spend a lot
of time covering for one another. Is it because of the amount of
blackmail dirt they have on each other?

Uh perhaps, national security? Able Danger may be shut down, but the
techniques and capabilities are still being used elsewhere. Do you want
the world, and bin Laden, to know those capabilities just to
potentially embarrass a past President?

Or, there is nothing to Able Danger, and sunlight would prove it. You
should be grateful to Rumsfeld. This way, you can hold onto your deep,
dark, conspiracy theories. ;-)

Grateful? The conspiracy theories keep me up at night searching the
internet. I'd get a lot more sleep if he'd put those uncertainties to rest
by letting those guys speak.

Why is it OK to publish the PDB's leading up to 9/11 in the Commission
report, but not information that may have ID'd Atta 1 1/2 years before 9/11?
I hope that you now realize that the 9/11 Commission was a complete
whitewash of what really happened in the decade leading up to 9/11.