On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:47:01 GMT, Don White wrote:

NOYB wrote:
"P Fritz" wrote in message
...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:35:48 -0400, DSK wrote:


PocoLoco wrote:

Not if he is enjoying the life he is living. Who are you to say what

lifestyle

NYOB would be 'better' enjoying?

Can't read, can you?

Did I say that one particular lifestyle is "better" than another? Why do
you try to argue with things I didn't say, maybe because the facts are
so consistantly against you?

Answer- I said that NOBBY's financial future would be more secure.

BTW living in debt and letting the rest of society pay for your
extravagant choices is not a conservative lifestyle. NOBBY is certainly
not the worst example, but he's far from being 'conservative' fiscally.
And the part I disapprove of is only that he's gambling with his
family's security and he appears to not understand the odds, nor the

risk.

DSK


Well, gosh. Your disapproval probably means a whole lot. His 'lifestyle'
includes living where he will.

He is being the typical liebral.......sticking his nose in everybody
else's
business.

How is "being in debt" forcing society to pay for his lifestyle?


He thinks that the tax deduction that I get for the interest on my home
mortgage is somehow subsidized by the government.

Of course, he fails to realize that it's just my own money that I'm allowed
to keep.



That's the thing stateside. If you were like us...and not allowed to
deduct any mortgage principal or interest from your income, you might
think different.

If we were like you, we'd all be named 'Harry'!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."