| 
				  
 
			
			Madame, I am 30 and my usual crew is younger.  I do not consider myself"older".  I think 50 ft is aproaching the top limit. (I sail a CR38).
 Of course, I do not think people buy 60 foot boats with the intent of
 "downgrading" when they get "older".  But at any rate.   (I hope I do
 not sound offended.  I've read your postings with great respect.)
 
 I do not think you have to consider what boat is too big for a crew of
 two to handle.  I think any "crew of two" should be able to at least
 hobble somewhere single-handed.  Things do not happen in isolation:  if
 something happens which disables one of your crew, chances are it also
 may have disabled some part of your boat.  Chances are the winds are
 stiff and the seas are high.  Chances are sea spray may have disabled
 those push-button winches (did we replace those cables before we left
 dock last time or did some head issue take precedence?)
 
 Racing is another story altogether.  I (used to) go four-wheel-driving
 in remote places.  A lot of 4wd people like to point at the stuff
 racing cars, winners of derbys etc, put on their cars.  I learned then:
 racing equipment is designed to last as long as the race, and no
 longer.  Racers cannot afford the extra weight associated with
 heavily-built, long-lasting equipment.  When racing, your objective is
 not to get from point A to point B. (Many cruisers have done so, after
 all.)  Your objective is to get ther first.  What happens afterwards
 does not matter.  When cruising on the other hand, it is not sufficient
 to get to poitn B.  You plan to then be on your way to point C, point
 D, etc.  (How many racers live on their boats?)
 
 (I do not mean to distract from the racers.  I just hope to show that
 the objectives are differnet, the equipment are more different.  (note
 here that another objective of racing is to make money, if only enough
 to fund your next race.  Cruisers do not expect to make money on their
 cruisng.)  And Ms. Ellen McD. has won very much respect from me, fwiw.)
 
 But to my original point: when all is well and all your crew is at
 100%, then we all may be able to handle a 60-footer with a crew of two.
 But most crusing folks I've talked to, from 30 to I-don't-dare-guess,
 have a story of an illness:  Crew 1 had a bad shoulder; Crew 2 was
 feverish.  Crew 1 got seasick; crew 2(autopilot/vane) gave up;  I've
 myself been both feverish and seasick.
 
 M. Bryan, I would be very interested to know of your acquaintances who
 live aboard, and cruise, aboard a 50, 60, or 70 footer.  I hope to be
 able to do so; I hope to learn something from them.
 
 Always learning.
 
 -Y
 
 
 |