On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:22:59 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:00:13 -0400, PocoLoco
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:19:58 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:08:08 -0400, PocoLoco
wrote:
~~ snippage ~~
I've a strong feeling there are a few folks right here in the group who will
have a six pack license very soon now! (Or maybe they'll just *say* they do!)
Is that a really bad thing though?
Even if you go to a school that teaches it's own test (which a lot of
these schools pretty much do), you still have to slog your way through
safety, regs, navigation (which in and of itself is a pretty valuable
education), signal recognition and you actually learn a lot even if it
is only to pass a test.
As to the experience thing, not everyone had a lot of experience and
at that, the OUPV is a qualifier of sorts as there are distance
qualifiers and the like. Around here, you see a lot of OUPV Captains
who has distance limits like 50 or 75miles, Inshore and you very
seldom see OUPV Captains with Near Shore qualifications.
I don't see the get your OUPV Captain's license schools as a bad thing
- I do see the under-qualified Master's as being a bad thing though.
That's one reason I downgraded mine because I really wasn't using it
and there really wasn't a reason for me to have it.
I disagree with using false pretenses to obtain recognition. That was one of the
main reasons I didn't vote for Kerry.
For OUPV (Six Pack) license, it's 360 days of experience on any water
over any period of time with 90 of those days being within three years
plus passing a recognized school.
That's not hard to obtain even for the most casual boater.
I reckon you're right.
--
John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
|