wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Star-bucks wrote:
Chuck,
I thought you were the person who was recommended that the "National
Police"
step in and take over local and national authority any time the
"National
Police" think they are not up to the task.

If you'd care to restate that so it makes some sense, I might try to
respond.

I think I've got a bead on Chuck now, he is an oppourtunist. If it suits
Chuck's immediate needs then he is for it. Whether this need is emotional
or
financial as long as it makes Chuck happy then he is for it.

You're entitled to your opinion, but you're seldom right about anything
and it would be unwise to bet the farm on your "bead". As you are
taking this to the realm of personal comments, can I assume that you've
exhausted the only line you can remember from the anti-liberal playbook
and have no futher argument to advance? If so, too bad.

I have been more right in the last 25 years that you have.

I haven't seen the anti-liberal/progressive playbook can you send me a copy.

What would you like to argue about?