*JimH* wrote:
"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On 12 Sep 2005 12:36:47 -0700, wrote:
*JimH* wrote:
Indeed, and the key word in your last sentence is "man". ;-)
So, are you still insisting that Canada hasn't helped in relief
efforts?
What about your pact to quit childish name calling, and OT posting?
Jim called you no name. I suggested you should be a man and apologize for
your
'mistake' that you turned into a large fabrication with your fake web
pages.
--
John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
I also never accused Canada of not giving anything to the relief effort. I
simply stated I had not read about any donations.
My exact words in the thread "Oh Canada" we
"Maybe I missed the news but so far I have not ready about any donations
from
your Country."
How ****ing stupid are you, Jim? You insinuated that Canada wasn't
helping, and you know it. YOU ****ed up, admit it. If not, then why did
you also say the following, when JohnH, your nose/ass buddy said:
"Canada's offers were made public about a day after the incident. Don't
remember
exactly, but they included a bunch of special mission C-130s. "
YOU then said:
"I obviously missed that....and if what you say is correct, I
apologize."
So, my question is, why are you apologizing for something you now claim
that you didn't do????