|
|
|
|
"PocoLoco" wrote in message
news 
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:31:33 -0400, PocoLoco
wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:22:43 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:
PocoLoco wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:57:06 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:
The NY Times has some superb photos and graphics of the coastal
situation in the Southeast.
http://tinyurl.com/9e47o
I hope some folks check out the evacuation (and inbound supply) routes
and
realize why getting all the food, water, equipment, security forces,
boats,
etc., may have been somewhat difficult.
The mighty US military should have the ability to land massive amounts
of materiel and food with amphibious vehicles.
I wonder what it is like to constantly have to rationalize the failures
of your party's president.
God, I should have left you filtered!
Do you expect maybe an Omaha Beach landing, Harry? Do you think we could
have
rounded up enough landing craft from the Marines at Camp Pendleton to do
the job
in about 5 hours? Where would they land, Harry? Oh, the ports are gone?
Well,
how about on the nice sandy beaches? Oh, they're gone too? Well, maybe
they
could just drive up on the under water roads? Oh, they're full of trash
and too
deep to drive trucks through?
Harry, get your head out of your ass for a change.
PS. Back you go. You're not worth much, Harry. Give us some more stories
about
your aid to New Orleans!
--
John H
"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Smart move.
|