"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Dave Hall wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:


That's almost funny. Here the left is always spouting about the
shortcomings of our government, and how they don't trust it to keep
terrorists at bay

There's no evidence the Bush Administration is keeping terrorists at
bay.

They're at least TRYING. More than I can say for sniveling democratic
wannabe presidential candidates, who want to CUT defense spending.

You think there is a connection between overspending on defense and
keeping a terrorist with a bomb and a Ryder truck away from a public
library or shopping mall?

If Dave replies "yes" to Harry's question, perhaps he could then explain why
the Republican-controlled congress cut a hundred-something million bucks
from the air marshall program last week. In other words, if more is better,
why are security funding promises being broken?

I don't suppose it has anything to do with the tax rebate/cut/vote buying
(choose your term) plan instituted by his moron leader.