View Single Post
  #68   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lines: 24
Message-ID:
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-Info: Please forward a copy of all headers for proper handling
X-Trace: pcpocbcnbdmdhgfgdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbogn kgkimpkinkdpecalcpdfdfhdacgfjaelmdnioidpmbdbkmhjeg gnkapmkkacaddkplkmhbobemncobcdelgnfhpjlkflkmjmfnnh jhhkgcnkjb
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:08:29 EDT
Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 15:08:29 GMT
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats.cruising:264989 rec.boats.electronics:61372


On 2005-08-19 dougdotson@NOSPAMcablespeedNOSPAMcom said:
I wrote:
But has the ITU changed the treaty? Nothing can happen until

then. Yep, did that at the last warc conference, I think 1999.
73

I know that isn't true. The code requirement was still in place as
of 2 or 3 years ago.

Yep, it was '03 and not '99 as I earlier stated. Looked through some
old records and noted somebody else called it right here in an early
article in this thread.
IT was under discussion in '99 but then was tabled only to come up
again inthe 2003 conference.




Richard Webb, amateur radio callsign nf5b
active on the Maritime Mobile service network, 14.300 mhz
REplace anything before the @ symbol with elspider for real email

--