On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:16:23 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:31:13 GMT, "Gorf" wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
It's a shame more people don't take the Washington Times. They'd get a
more
'fair and balanced' set of stories on which to base their opinions. Given
the
current reporting and coverage, I'm surprised he's showing more than about
a 20%
approval rating.

Just like FOX is "fair and balanced".........


Thank you! The problem with anything that is 'fair and balanced' is that seems
'ultra-conservative' because of what so many are used to.



No, the problem is that Fox and The Washington Times are blatantly and
overtly right wing, and the Times is controlled by a felon who runs a
right-wing religious cult.

No, the Post, NY & LA Times, NBC, CBS, and ABC are blatantly liberal. As
usual, you've got it backwards.

Being religious didn't seem to bother you when Kerry was running!

Tell us about the Lobsta boat. You'd be more believable.

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD