View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

P. Fritz cut-n-pasted:
We know from simple physics that the additional energy added to the climate
system by the doubling of atmospheric CO2 is about four watts per square
meter (W/m2)--a very small amount of energy when compared to the 342 watts
per square meter


If the guys who published this think that a 1% net increase in the
Earth's average temperature is insignificant, then you might as well not
bother to follow any of the rest of their "science."

This same article goes on to babble about the uncertainty of effects of
cloud cover and atmospheric movement, which is basically admitting they
have no idea what the effect of that claimed 1% increase in energy
would be. But then, who cares if they're spouting ignorant BS as long as
it supports your political agenda.

Every once in a while, a state or local gov't body gets the bright idea
to make PI equal three. Boy wouldn't that be simpler? But it just
doesn't work. Nor do legislative attempts to make water run up hill.

DSK