"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
What this usually means is that the small business wants gov't handouts
or
a
reduced tax rate.
Pay your fair share...the unionized working class sure are.

Why must you always be such a dim bulb? The "unionized working class"
would
not have jobs if not for small businesses. Here's some stats for you:


Actually, you have it backwards. If it weren't for workers, there
wouldn't be any small businesses, or large businesses, for that matter.

I knew you'd make this point...and I really can't argue against it, except
for the exceptions you made below. However, I'd add one caveat to your
statement: businesses *can* operate without *unionized* working class.

You can have a society in which every man or woman is his or her own
producer (a farmer, a sawyer, a cobbler, et cetera, who trades with
others for sustenance, and without anything but the smallest family
businesses, but you cannot have most small or any medium or large
businesses without workers.

Agreed.

We had such a business-less society when
this country was first settled.

So it can work...but we'd be living in the dark ages.


Capital is subservient to labor.

And vice-versa.