"DSK" wrote in message
...
Actually, she mentioned them last week. But you can bet that if the
Bush administration enters into any agreements with Kim, it will be on
more than a spit and a handshake...and it will be subject to inspections
of N. Korea by the US and other countries.


In other words, very similar to Clinton's successful policy.



NOYB wrote:
Really? How many U.S.-led inspection teams travelled to Pyongyang during
Clinton's watch?

How many have during Bush's watch?

Bush didn't give N. Korea $4 billion in aid in exchange for an empty
promise.


How many do you think will?

I don't believe Bush will give any aid to Kim...so the question is moot.


Or Iran?

I think it's more likely that Israeli or US forces will strike suspected
Iranian nuke sites than inspect them. The Iranians don't appear to be
willing to cave on the nuke inspection issue.



Or Libya? And why do you think any inspection teams *have* to be led by an
American?

Led, accompanied by, whatever. The point is inspection teams with US
representatives on them.


Do you know anything at all about the accepted non-proliferation
protocols?

The "protocols" change from administration to administration. Clinton
believed in appeasement and Bush believes in pre-emption.


Do you care

Not really.