"Joe Blizzard" wrote in message
...
"J. Smithers" wrote
The guy was having trouble counting his change,
he definitely did not need to be on the road.

So get him off the road. That's my point. We can all recognize when
somebody really shouldn't be driving and we don't need to send blood to
the lab to do it. Making the guy who has no signs of impairment other than
a .08 BAC reading equal in the eyes of the law to the guy who's obviously
drunk is foolish.




I don't think the cops have the time for making value judgements, even
though they should. Legally, things would probably get sticky without some
sort of metrics. However, I *do* see your point about how subjective
inebriation can be. I only know how it affects me differently, depending on
time of day, what I've eaten, and what activity I'm involved in. If I'm out
in the sun, maybe snacking instead of eating real meals, one beer will
sometimes flatten me, and I *know* it's going to happen. (That's why the one
fishing beer usually remains in the cooler). Other times, 2 bourbons mixed
with appetizers and dinner have less of an effect. But, I have friends who
expect to reach a certain level of buzz much quickly, and they're unable to
judge things very well, putting down 3 cocktails before they've had food.
One in particular loses her ability to judge appropriate comments, and often
doesn't remember what she said the night before. Obviously a problem.

But still, cops can only make judgements in the way they write speeding
tickets: They see a snapshot of an activity. I don't like it, but that's how
it is.