BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

wrote:
Mr Wizzard wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
According to JimH's analogy, this is on topic, because boats use
energy.

More proof that Republicans are pigs at the trough.

Majority Leader Tom DeLay may have faded from the front pages, but he's
still up to his dirty tricks. Yesterday, Rep. Henry Waxman revealed
that DeLay slipped "a $1.5 billion giveaway to the oil industry,
Halliburton, and Sugar Land, Texas" into the energy bill.

So help me understand here So what exactally is "wrong" with
things that favor Haliburton, and having oil as our best interest?
To this day, I honestly don't understand this. Be it awarding
Haliburton with contracts in Iraq, or this, (or any other thing
that favors Haliburton, and/or the oil industry). Isn't this actually
a "good" thing ? I mean, as I understand it, Haliburton is a very
experienced at oil exploration/consulting etc., and they are State
side, and hire mostly Americans, right ? I mean, they are the
best equipped to do the job, so what's the problem? Further,
what is wrong with haveing oil as one of this country's best interests?
Who does it benefit to "not" have oil as our best interest? (and how)?
What, you want $9/gallon gas like in Europe and such? Having oil
in our best interest (be it wartime, *or* peacetime) is a very noble
thing. And it should go to the most experienced, best equipped
company, and even better if the company is an American company
comprised or American workers operating on American lands.
(not the French - they got caught in an illegal $60B oil deal
with one Mr Saddam Hussien).

I take it that you didn't get this part: The provision was
"mysteriously inserted" into the text of the
energy bill "after the conference was closed, so members of the
conference committee had no opportunity to consider or reject this
measure."

It was inserted AFTER THE CONFERENCE WAS CLOSED, so no one, republican
or democrat, was able to consider or reject it.

That's been the norm lately. Publish a bill about the size of the
Manhattan Yellow Pages and deliver it to lawmakers about 4:30 on a
Saturday afternoon.
Call for a vote at 8:30 the following Monday morning. "Don't worry,
we'll condense those 600,000 words down into a little sound byte so you
will know what you're voting on." Right. I'm sure the D's were just as
blatantly abusive when they had the majority, but that doesn't excuse
this practice from either side.

This new wrinkle of tinkering with the bill after the conference
committee has met and gone back to the chambers with a "do pass"
recommendation is certainly immoral, if not downright illegal. It's on
the same level as changing the terms of a contract after some of the
parties in the contract have already signed it

My question remains unanswered month after month, year after year,
scandalous fraud after scandalous fraud: If some particular school of
political thought is so obviously right for America and so incredibly
fair in practice- why do the operatives of any particular school of
political thought have to rely on lying, cheating, and trickery to
produce results or attempt to remain in power?