"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
NOYB wrote:

It's pretty amazing that 2 1/2 years in a hostile country with porous
borders surrounded by enemy countries has produced fewer casualties
than 1 fateful day in September '01. It wasn't insurgents who killed
those 3,000 Americans on 9/11...and it's not insurgents who killed
1800 US troops and countless Iraqi civilians since March 2003.


Not sure how your Funk & Wagnels defines insurgents...but I went to
Google and entered "insurgents" + "iraq" in the search engine. Google
says there are over 2 million hits.

There's no requirement that an insurgent be a native of the country in
which he or she is fighting. Further, NOYB is suffering from "old think"
here. The Muslims are bound together by religion, not by geography. It's
a Muslim insurgency.

That's a good argument to nuke the whole region, eh?



No, it is not.

Let me know when one arises then. The plans are already drafted to destroy
Iran should another 9/11-type attack occur...particularly if it's with WMD.
After 9/11, even you were calling for "bombing Afghanistan into the stone
age". I suspect that we'll strike while the iron is hot next time.