On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:05:32 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Jack Goff" wrote:

And through it all, you've still failed to show how your opinions are
anything but that... opinions.


As I've explained to you in the past, there is no possibility that your
puppy is not damaged in some way. I know it would disturb your day to day
trance to admit it, but at some point in the future, you will. You probably
want a fancy clinical name for his condition, but I can't help you with
that. It's enough to say that if you were interviewing for a job that
required any sort of intelligence and someone like him came along, you'd
move his job application to the bottom of the pile. You know that.


And you still fail to prove, in any way, shape or form, your strange
claims. You believe that your supposedly intellectualy superior
liberals somehow are better, but they keep being topped by President
Bush and company, who you think are somehow inferior to your bunch.

Maybe you need to hang out with a better crowd, huh?

I have hired a guy that is not well spoken, but is *very* intelligent,
and is one of our top performers. We have another that is not
visually pleasing, but is very effective at his job. You should be
more accepting of people. Being so superficially judgemental of
people is very small of you.

But as far as being a liberal, I guess I can understand your wanting
to root for the underdog. However, you seem damaged in your own way.
Have fun, Douglas.