Dave wrote:
My experience is that when one gets paid based on the quality of his
results, those results are likely to be better.

And all you need to do in order to have a horse that make a jump of
height X is to take one horse at a time, and shoot each one that cannot
make the jump.

So, you are making the claim that commercial weather broadcasters should
be allowed to sell us data that we have already paid for because their
forecasts are more accurate?

Don't bogart that joint, my friend.

DSK