"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net...

You know that newspaper you hate? They're suggesting he's a decent
choice. You might not be comfortable with why they're saying this.
Let's see if you can figure it out.

NY Times? Washington Post? LA Times? There are so many, it would
take more effort than I'm willing to give to figure out which article
you're talking about. Why don't you post the article?



NYT. Front page today. Your little puppy may have chosen someone who
real conservatives (the ones who haven't been pithed like frogs for a
biology class) feel is credible. By doing this, the puppy may gain some
credibility with people who have recently disowned him.

You said:
"You might not be comfortable with why they're saying this"


So what wouldn't I be comfortable with?


I believe your puppy was forced to compromise. He may have ended up with
a better judge than we expected, but lost because he got someone who
doesn't sound simple. We win, he loses. Not surprising.

Actually *you* lost as GWB won two consecutive terms. He therefore earned
the right to name a replacement Supreme Court Justice.

The Democratic party will again be the loser if they decide to filibuster or
otherwise drag out his approval.

Mark my word on this.